·
The idea that solving the Israel/Palestinian
question is the key to unlocking the problems of the region was what everyone
who wanted to sound as if they knew what they were saying was most delighted to
say: "What was that about Yemen? Well of course the real problem we need
to solve is the Israel/Palestinian issue." Rarely in diplomatic history
has so much been got so wrong by so many people for so long.
·
With the civil war in Syria
grinding through its third year, Egypt descended into ethnic and inter-religious
barbarism, and the American Secretary of State reduced to promising
"unbelievably small" action by the world's only super-power, it is
hard to find any chinks of light. But one, perhaps, exists. It is that we may
finally have seen the explosion of one of the most embedded and central myths
of our time: the idea that the Israel-Palestinian conflict is the
"key" to sorting out the problems of the Middle East.
·
After seeing what has
happened since the "Arab Spring" began, this might be an appropriate
moment to ask whether or not every Western foreign minister deserves simply to
be sacked and sent back to school. Rarely in diplomatic history has so much
been got so wrong by so many people for so long.
·
For at least the twenty
years since the Oslo Accords, the idea that the Israel-Palestinian conflict was
the "key" to unlocking the problems of the Middle East was the
leitmotif of any discussion about the Middle East and North Africa areas. So
pervasive was it that people could refer to the "Middle East" problem
as though everyone agreed that there was only one problem across that whole set
of benighted lands.
·
While of course it would be
nice if all disputes could be solved — Cyprus, Kashmir, Turkey, Morocco, Tibet
-- what is worse is that the allegation came from every side of the political
spectrum. Politicians of the left said it. Politicians of the right said it.
The idea that solving the Israel/Palestinian question was the key to unlocking
the problems of the region was what everyone who wanted to sound as if they
knew what they were saying was most delighted to say: "What was that about
Yemen? Well of course the real problem we need to solve is the
Israel/Palestinian issue." "A bomb was planted in which Western city?
Well what we really need to do is solve that border dispute issue of the
Israelis."
·
Further, one of the oddest
things about all this is that for some reason, when the alleged centrality of
the issue should have been swept aside most completely, it became instead even
more central.
·
After 9/11, when Western
cities began to be places on the front-line of a global effort to express
innumerable Islamist grievances and extort endless Islamist demands, the free
world's leaders instead decided to play this long-defunct tune one more time.
·
For instance there was the
whole Bush era push to address the "key" issue. Tony Blair boasted in
his memoirs of his determination to persuade George W. Bush that the quid pro
quo for support for the war in Iraq must be a boost to the Israel-Palestinian
peace process. Blair's belief in the centrality of the issue was endless -- as
it remains. Then, as now, it was confirmed by a particular type of politician
on the ground. Blair recalls a meeting with the Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad
Siniora in September 2006 in which Siniora stressed that there could never be
peace in the region until "Israel/Palestine" was resolved. "With
it, everything is possible; without it, nothing is," he said. Blair
clearly nodded this through, "I pledged again to do what I could to get
the U.S. president to refocus our efforts on it."
·
Elsewhere Blair recalls
another period of mulling on the Israel/Palestinian issue. "With that [the
peace talks] stalled, all manner of bad things were going to happen." This
idea was not just the pet theory of the Prime Minister. It permeated the
Foreign Office establishment as well as Blair's disciples and heirs in
Parliament. David Miliband, his former Foreign Secretary was still talking
about the centrality of the dispute just last year when, by then in opposition,
he used a television interview on something else entirely to talk about that
this dispute being the one that was "key" and most in need of
addressing.
·
This is not, however, just
a Labour party problem. The Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron has
repeated the same theme ad nauseum. And so has the Foreign Secretary William
Hague and every one of the current political establishment with barely one
exception.
·
If a list of exponents of
this fallacy were ever compiled in full it would outrun the patience of the
most diligent reader. The message, needless to say, ran across Europe.
Catherine Ashton -- the lamentable EU Foreign Minister -- has spent her time in
office even since 2009 parroting the "key to the region" motif. She
has shown a remarkable ability to hold this thought in her head even as her
period of office has seen the Middle East fall apart almost everywhere other
than in the Israel/Palestinian areas. Even the former head of the British
domestic intelligence service, MI5, has said that the "grievance"
over the Israel/Palestinian issue is a factor we must address for domestic
security reasons.
·
I have dwelt on Britain,
but the same story can be told anywhere in the West. It can be told by the
bucket-load in each and every European country. And of course the same story
can be told in the U.S. -- where the current administration as well as their
predecessors seem to have swallowed the motif hook, line and sinker.
·
In three years of
uprisings, overthrows, revolutions and counter-revolutions, barely a protester in any country has come out onto the streets to express their irritation at
current housing arrangements in East Jerusalem. In every instance they have
come out to demand a say in their future or to demand work, fair pay,
opportunities or simple amenities such as food. The demands of the Palestinian
people and their propagandists in the West have not even been at the bottom of
the list of demands in a single one of the Arab uprisings. And just as Israel
has played no part in their revolutions, so it has played less-than-no part in
their ensuing civil conflicts.
·
It is time to face up to
the fact that in almost all Western countries, entire foreign ministries and
political establishments have been caught repeating a motif so wrong-headed, so
completely mistaken that if they had any shame, they should now be silent. In
the meantime we should tell them that although it is possible we will listen to
them at some point in the future, we will not do so until they have gone away
for a time and successfully returned.
Douglas Murray compellingly raised doubt as to whether the key to all the problems in the Middle East and North Africa is the solution of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. But, if the Israel-Palestinian conflict is not the cause of conflict in the unfree Muslim countries, he should have pointed to the cause. The answer, in fundamentalist Muslim minds, is that the Catholic King and Queen of Spain defeated the Muslims and forced them out in 1492. (And after they forced out the Muslims, they force the Jews to leave or convert.) But Muslim tradition says that any land won by Muslims must stay under their control. That's a problem. If the Spanish would just give back southern Spain, say, to the King of Morocco, everything would be alright. Right? (Oh, there may be other countries to be returned to Muslim control.)
ReplyDelete