by Khaled Abu Toameh January 16, 2014
It is
interesting how one comment from an Israeli minister has managed to strain relations
between the U.S. Administration and Israel, while fiery rhetoric and street
demonstrations against Kerry and Obama in the Palestinian territories and Arab
capitals are completely ignored by Washington.
The U.S.
Administration has reacted quickly and strongly to statements attributed to
Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon. Ya'alon was quoted by the Israeli daily
Yedioth Ahronot as describing U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry as
"messianic and obsessive."
In
response, the U.S. condemned Ya'alon's comments as
"offensive and inappropriate."
But
while the U.S. Administration has been quick in issuing a response to the
Israeli minister's statements, it continues to ignore remarks and
demonstrations against Kerry made by Palestinians and other Arabs.
Palestinian
officials representing various organizations, including the Palestinian
Authority, have been denouncing Kerry almost on a daily basis over the past few
weeks. But these condemnations do not seem to bother the State Department.
Among
the officials who have been extremely critical of Kerry's role in the current
Israeli-Palestinian peace talks is Yasser Abed Rabbo, the PLO's
Secretary-General and one of the closest advisors to Palestinian Authority
President Mahmoud Abbas.
Just
last month, Abed Rabbo launched a scathing attack on Kerry, denouncing his
latest proposals as unacceptable. "Kerry does not have the right to decide
where our borders will be," the top PLO official said. "If the U.S. wants, it can give
parts of California or Washington to Israel. Kerry's framework agreement is
very dangerous."
Abed
Rabbo has also accused Kerry of seeking to "appease
Israel by fulfilling its expansionist demands in the Jordan Valley under the
pretext of security. He wants to buy Israeli silence over the Iran deal (with
the six big powers)."
Palestinian
officials have also been leaking details about Kerry's latest proposals for
reaching an agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Some have
gone as far as accusing Kerry of being biased in favor of Israel, working
toward "liquidating" the Palestinian cause and trying to extort the
Palestinians.
Tayseer
Khaled, member of the PLO Executive Committee, was recently quoted as accusing Kerry of trying to
extort the Palestinians politically. Khaled's allegations have since been
repeated by other Palestinians.
In
addition, anti-Kerry demonstrations have become a common
phenomenon in Ramallah and other Palestinian cities in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip. At some of these protests, Kerry is often condemned as a pawn in the
hands of Israel.
At another
protest in Ramallah, Palestinians chanted, "Oh Kerry, you coward, you have
no room in Palestine."
In
Bethlehem several weeks ago, Palestinians took to the streets to protest against
Kerry's visit to the city. And when President Barack Obama visited Bethlehem
last year, Palestinians hurled shoes at his portrait and chanted,
and set fire to his photograph.
Anti-Kerry
protests have also taken place in Egypt and Jordan, where protesters also torched
his portrait and declared him persona non grata.
Why,
then, Kerry is not just as offended by the Arab condemnations?
It is
interesting to see how one comment from an Israeli minister has managed to
strain relations between the U.S. Administration and Israel, while fiery
rhetoric and street demonstrations against Kerry and Obama in the Palestinian
territories and Arab capitals are completely ignored by Washington. If Kerry
really cares about the peace process, he also needs to ask the Palestinian
Authority and Arab governments to lower the tone and stop inciting against him
and the U.S. Unless, of course, those statements and protests do not offend
him.
I wonder if a subtle kind of racism is at work here, in the sense of expecting less of non-Jews.
ReplyDeleteI also wonder if Israel and the P.A. are a sideshow to the real danger in the ME, the government of Iran.