By David Bernstein
2/12/2014
For the full
article see; http://tinyurl.com/nllnlz7
Former AP journalist Matti Friedman wrote an article this past Summerabout how the media
frames the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians for an online magazine
called Tablet. To his surprise, it went viral, with almost one
hundred thousand Facebook shares. It was recommended at the VC by David Post and me. Many people think it’s the single best
article ever written on the topic, in part because it provides a rare insider
perspective, from someone who actually worked for a major media company’s
Jerusalem bureau.
Friedman is back with an even longer and, I think,
even more revealing article on the same topic, this time in The Atlantic. Among other things,
he ruminates about how many Israel correspondents act not as objective
journalists, but as part of class of mostly foreign elites who live in Israel
or the territories and have taken up the Palestinian cause. This class includes
the employees of international organizations based in the Palestinians territories,
and several left-wing Israeli NGOs.
Friedman points out that these highly influential
organizations are almost never subjected to any real scrutiny by the reporters
who rely on them as objective sources. And indeed, the Associated Press,
according to Friedman, actually banned its journalists from
interviewing Gerald Steinberg, an American-Israeli professor who runs the
watchdog organization NGO Monitor out of Jerusalem. Here’s the relevant
paragraph:
Around this time, a Jerusalem-based group called NGO
Monitor was battling the international organizations condemning Israel after
the Gaza conflict, and though the group was very much a pro-Israel outfit and
by no means an objective observer, it could have offered some partisan
counterpoint in our articles to charges by NGOs that Israel had committed “war
crimes.” But the bureau’s explicit orders to reporters were to never quote the
group or its director, an American-raised professor named Gerald Steinberg. In
my time as an AP writer moving through the local conflict, with its myriad
lunatics, bigots, and killers, the only person I ever saw subjected to an
interview ban was this professor.
Long-time readers will recall that I’ve relied on NGO
Monitor’s work in the past. Indeed, one of the most consequential “scoops” I’ve
had as a blogger, that Human Rights Watch Middle East director Sarah Leah
Whitson fundraised among rich Saudi Arabians with a pledge to use the money to
counter pro-Israel forces in the West, came from NGO Monitor. My blog post on
this, reprinted at the Wall Street Journal’s website,
set off a controversy about HRW’s anti-Israel bias that has yet to fully recede
(and assuredly won’t until someone less maniacally anti-Israel than Whitson and
her boss Kenneth Roth is in charge).
No comments:
Post a Comment