Video Of The Week - CNN lies corrected by Bennett- https://tinyurl.com/yc6735tf
For the full Article go to the Spectator - https://tinyurl.com/2p96jkjk
If you’re after evidence of apartheid in Israel, you don’t have to
look very far. Amid rioting by Palestinians and Arabs, the Israel Police
has declared the Temple
Mount in Jerusalem off-limits. For ten days, only practitioners of one religion
will be allowed to visit.
For context, Temple Mount is home to the Holy of Holies, the most
sacred site in Judaism, and is where the First and Second Temples stood until
their destruction by the Babylonians and Romans, respectively. Following
Jerusalem’s conquest by Islamic imperialists in the 7th century, a succession
of caliphs worked to Islamise the Temple Mount by erecting Muslim worship sites
including the Dome of the Rock, built on top of the old Jewish temple, and
Al-Aqsa Mosque, the third-holiest site in Islam.
In recent days, Arab and Muslim rioters have run amok on the
Temple Mount and throughout the Old City. They have fired off Molotov
cocktails and rocks at law
enforcement from inside Al-Aqsa. They have beaten religious
Jews on their way to pray at the Western Wall. They have stoned at least ten
buses, injuring passengers including a 13-year-old girl. Hence why the Israel
Police has said adherents of one religion and one religion alone will be
permitted on the Temple Mount for the next ten days. That one religion is,
naturally, Islam.
For centuries, Jews were forbidden from
ascending Temple Mount by the occupying empire of the day
Welcome to Israel, apartheid state. This interdict is not unusual and nor is
the tumult that has occasioned it; both have played out semi-regularly in
recent years. Religious discrimination against non-Muslims is in fact routine
on Temple Mount, which is governed by the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf, a Jordanian
religious trust, in cooperation with the Israel Police.
For centuries, Jews were forbidden from ascending Temple Mount by
the occupying empire of the day, and even after they liberated their capital
city in 1967, almost all senior rabbis have forbidden Jews to set foot on the
hill. Nevertheless, some have persisted and Israel permits a limited number of
its Jewish citizens to visit their holiest site, provided they do not pray
while there. Those Jews who do pray are arrested. Jews may only
enter the complex through a separate gate designated
for use by non-Muslims.
The virtues of these arrangements are open to question. For one,
they concede Islamic and Palestinian supremacist views about the Temple Mount
and the freedom of Jews to worship there. Limiting Jewish access to the hill
does not stop Palestinian terror groups, preachers and media routinely
prompting riots with false claims that the Zionists are ‘storming Al-Aqsa’.
Israeli police operations to curtail said rioting are then packaged by the
international media and NGOs as a wanton Israeli attack on Muslim holy sites
and worshipers, a framing amplified by gullible western
progressives.
Ariel Sharon’s decision to visit Temple Mount in 2000 is generally
agreed to be the cause of the Second Intifada, in which Palestinian suicide
bombers murdered more than a thousand Israelis. (If you’re wondering why the
lesson from this incident was ‘Israeli Prime Ministers must not be so
provocative as to visit Jewish holy sites in their own capital city’ and not
‘blowing up buses and pizza parlours for four years because someone walked up a
hill seems a bit extreme’, you just failed your Foreign Office civil service
exam.) Nor do the current arrangements do much for the sacrosanctity of
Al-Aqsa, the mosque that is ‘desecrated’ by Israeli police entering to stop
rioting but not by the rioting itself.
Rather than acknowledge Israel’s self-denying efforts to keep the
peace on Temple Mount, the international community simply breezes past them and
onto their condemnations. It is taken as given that Israel ought to cede
sovereignty in its capital city and task its police with arresting Jewish
citizens for praying on a hill. This goes to the hypocrisy that runs through
elite western (and, it must be said, Israeli) discourses on Israel and the
Palestinians. Western legal norms and the assumptions of rights-based
liberalism are applied – often, though not always, dishonestly – to
characterise Israeli laws, military decisions and security measures as
arbitrary and discriminatory, motivated by racial and religious malice and a
nationalist desire to dominate the Palestinians. Because Israel is not Sweden,
it is damned as South Africa.
Yet this commitment to universalising western values only goes one
way. It is not applied to Palestinian demands for a
Jew-free state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, nor to Palestinian prohibitions –
backed up by the death penalty –
against selling property to Jews. Most noticeably, it does not apply when
Israel discriminates against its Jewish citizens and restricts their liberty of
movement and freedom to manifest their religious faith. Israelis often complain
about double standards but there is only one standard and it is always against
Israel.
The Temple Mount compromise is messy, unjust, inequitable and
probably doesn't bring a fraction of the benefits the Israeli security
establishment tells itself, but it is an accommodation made in the interests of
public order, stability, and coexistence. It is plainly discriminatory against
Jews but Israel figures, rightly or wrongly, that this is the price of keeping
an uneasy peace. There's your apartheid state.
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE the BIG mailing list please
click HERE NEW ,VIEW
OUR WEBSITE WWW.BRITISHISRAELGROUP.WEEBLY.COM