JPost 12-7-2017
UNESCO
failed to recognized Jewish claims to the burial site of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob,
Sarah, Rebecca and Leah.
For the first time ever, the 21-member World Heritage committee
recognized on Friday a significant Jewish religious site — the Cave of the
Patriarchs — as part of the State of Palestine.
In a secret ballot vote, 12 countries approved this ruling on Hebron’s Old Town
and the Cave. Three objected and six abstained.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed the
vote as another “delirious” act by UNESCO.
“This time, they determined that the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron is a
Palestinian heritage site, meaning that it is not a Jewish site and that it is
in danger."
“Not a Jewish site?” he asked. “After all, who is buried there?
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Sarah, Rebecca and Leah, our patriarchs and
matriarchs,” Netanyahu said.
“The site is in danger? Only in places where Israel exists, like in Hebron, is
freedom of worship guaranteed for all,” he said.
“Everywhere else in the Middle East, mosques, churches and synagogues are being
destroyed,” Netanyahu said. “We’ll continue to safeguard the Cave of the
Patriarchs, freedom of religion and truth."
In Krakow, Poland, where the vote took place, Israel's Ambassador to UNESCO,
Carmel Shama HaCohen, had a theatrical response. He took out his cell phone and
said, “Mr. Chairman. It’s my plumber in my apartment in Paris. There is a huge
problem in my toilet and it is much more important than the decision you just
adopted.”
Foreign Ministry spokesman Emmanuel Nachshon tweeted, “The UNESCO decision on
Hebron & Tomb of Patriarchs is a moral blot. Shame on UNESCO.”
President Reuven Rivlin tweeted, “UNESCO seems intent on sprouting anti-Jewish
lies, while it remains silent as the region's heritage is destroyed by brutal
extremists.”
Palestinian Ambassador Elias Sanbar thanked the nations who had supported his
government’s third designation on the list of World Heritage in Danger, since it
was recognized as member state of UNESCO in 2011.
“Palestine has not inscribed a religion on the World Heritage List. Religion
cannot be inscribed on such a list. It can only be something that can be felt,
something we can fight for,” Sanbar said.
“The Palestinian state is sovereign even though it is under occupation. It is
acting within its full rights when it takes the initiative to nominate this
city for inscription on the World Heritage List. This city which is on its
territory. I think it should be absolutely obvious that the people who have
something on their territory are able to inscribe that site. I do think the
message is clear, but also a reminder is called for. My lands are the only
lands in the whole world which are sacred to all three monotheistic religions,”
Sanbar said.
“We have a shared tradition of pluralism which extends back centuries and which
calls for empathy and solidarity,” he said. “What has happened on that sacred
land is something that is a legacy for all us, be we Jewish, Muslim or
Christian or agnostic... The revelations that took place there on that land,
the Palestinian land, is not limited to the mosque, the sacred sites on this
land are sacred one and all.”
But the bulk of the Palestinian Authority’s proposal to World Heritage
Committee focused on the Hebron’s Islamic history in its Old Town, starting
from the Mamluk period in 1250 and through the Ottoman Empire which collapsed
during World War I.
The Herodian era structure was built over a double cave, where the three
Biblical patriarchs and matriarchs are said to have been buried. The cave is
situated in a plot of land that was purchased by Abraham, according to the
Bible.
Located in the heart of Hebron’s Old Town, it houses both Jewish sanctuaries of
worship and the Ibrahimi mosque. It is Judaism’s second holiest site and
Islam’s fourth.
The United States, Canada and Australia all spoke against UNESCO's ruling, even
though they are not committee members.
“The decision to inscribe Hebron/Al Khalil Old Town on an emergency basis is
divisive, confusing and impossible to justify. The site is not under any real
or immediate threat. The only urgency here is the urgency to express political
anger," the US representative said.
"Had the committee shown patience, this inscription might have represented
, at some time in the future, an example of the World Heritage Committee as the
international community’s best tool for cultural dialogue, mutual understanding
and peace. Instead, the politically motivated decision today to inscribe only
further stains UNESCO’s reputation and further divides this house."
The resolution that was approved made no mention of the problems with the
Palestinian Authority’s application that the International Council of Monuments
and Sites (ICOMOS) detailed in its report.
ICOMOS, the professional body that evaluates sites, took issue with the
application, particularly with respect to the focus on the Muslim period of a
city that has such strong roots in three monotheistic religions.
An initial paragraph summarizing the committee’s reservations was rejected by
the World Heritage Committee. A number of member states noted in the debate
that the ICOMOS report marked the first time the organization had not clearly
rejected a site that it failed to recommend.
After more than an hour of technical debates, the World Heritage Committee
adopted instead a new amended text by Lebanon, Kuwait and Tunisia.
That text stated that the Palestinian Authority application did meet the
criteria for both the World Heritage List and as an endangered site. The
language made no specific reference to any religion or the cave, but other
documents related to the inscription do take up both issues.
Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki praised the outcome in a
statement. "This vote is considered a success in the diplomatic battle
Palestine is fighting on all fronts."
"Despite the heated Israeli campaign, spreading of lies, the distortion
and falsification of facts regarding Palestinian rights, the world approved our
right to register Hebron and the Ibrahimi Mosque under Palestinian sovereignty
and as World Heritage sites," said al-Maliki.
Israel's Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely described the vote as a
"badge of shame for UNESCO, which time after time prefers to stand with
the side of lies."
Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman reacted to the vote by describing UNESCO as a
"politically-biased, embarrassing and antisemitic organization."
Education Minister Naftali Bennett joined in the criticism of the vote.
"It is disappointing and disgraceful that, time and again, UNESCO denies
history and distorts reality, knowingly serving those attempting to erase the
Jewish state," said Bennett. "Israel will not resume its cooperation
with UNESCO so long as it remains a political tool, rather than professional
organization."
Yair Lapid, chairman of the Yesh Atid party, also responded, saying, “UNESCO’s
decision to recognize the Cave of Patriarchs as a Palestinian heritage site is
a despicable falsification of history. Does UNESCO not believe that the Bible
is heritage? It’s a decision that, at best, stems from utter ignorance and, at
worst, from hypocrisy and antisemitism.”